PATHS Through School Choice

Parents And Teachers Helping Students

Home

Our Board of Advisors

MAKE A DONATION

A Choice Trend

A Choice History

Choice Legislation

AUSTRIA

CANADA

CHILE

COLOMBIA

THE CZECH REPUBLIC

DENMARK

ENGLAND

FINLAND

HUNGARY

NEW ZEALAND

PAKISTAN

POLAND

SLOVAK REPUBLIC

SPAIN

SWEDEN

UGANDA

VIETNAM

Arizona

District of Columbia

Florida

Georgia

Hawaii

Illinois

Iowa

Maine

Minnesota

Ohio

Pennsylvania

Rhode Island

Texas

Utah

Vermont

Virginia

Wisconsin

Choice Resources

Choice Books

Contact Your Legislators

About us

How I Came To Choice

Contact Us

Ohio

Proposed choice legislation for the state of Ohio includes SB 65 which would create the Special Education Scholarship Program to provide scholarships for handicapped children to attend alternative public or private special education programs.  Under the bill, a child would be eligible for a special education scholarship if the child's resident school district has identified the child as handicapped and developed an IEP for the child.  Also, the child must either have been enrolled in the district's public schools (K-12) prior to the year the scholarship is intended to be used, or simply enrolled in the district the same year the scholarship is used.

Additional proposed choice legislation in the state of Ohio includes the 100 Percent Solution, or Weighted Student Funding. 

Weighted Student Funding

To solve the problems of inequity and antiquity plaguing our system of education financing and to ensure that all children receive a quality education, dramatic change is needed. Weighted student funding (WSF) is the best solution. We believe that five principles must be embraced to reform school financing and close the achievement gaps.

1. Funding should follow the child, on a per-student basis, to the public school that he/she attends.38
2. Per-student funding should vary according to a child?s need and other relevant circumstances.
3. The funds should arrive at the school as real dollars (i.e., not teaching positions, ratios, or staffing norms) that can be spent flexibly, with accountability gauged by results, not inputs, programs, or activities.
4. These principles for allocating money to schools should apply to all levels (e.g., federal funds going to states, state funds going to districts, districts to schools).
5. All funding systems should be simplified and made transparent.

Sidebar: Winners and Losers in Cincinnati

After the implementation of WSF in Cincinnati, there were changes in the funding of every school in the district. On average, schools gained or lost $266 per-pupil-4.2 percent of the average school budget. The largest gain was $730,881-a 16.8 percent increase in that school's original budget. The largest loss was $595,316-a 16.4 percent decrease in that school's original budget.* Significant losses were not confined only to schools with large percentage decreases in budgets. With the elimination of special-program funding, many long-treasured programs across the district-each with its supporters-lost funding.**

 

For more information on WSF and the 100 Percent Solution, visit www.100percentsolution.org, or the Fordham Institute, www.edexcellence.net.


www.paths2choice.com